Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 9,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 10:39 pm
Shit happens.The details: 138 exonerations, 1 for every 9 people executed.The reasons: Bad lawyers, bad forensics, biased juries, etc., etc., etc.And the beat goes on.Of course, none of this will end anything. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
The terse 996-word letter agreement filed with this morning’s 8-K offers little insight into the timing; nor does the company’s press release, aside from the perennial desire of hard-charging senior executives to spend more time with their families. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
Written by John Heckman of Heckman Consulting. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:40 am
They're not, that is, making a facial challenge to capital punishment.What John Green's lawyers are going to be presenting for two weeks beginning today is evidence thatArticle 37.071, § 2 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure [is] unconstitutional as applied, pursuant to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and Article 1, Section 13 of the Texas Constitution.That section of the Code of Criminal Procedure lays out the… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
On Wednesday 1 December 2010 the Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of Spiller v Joseph ([2010] UKSC 53). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:18 am
What does this have to do with Wikileaks? [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:19 pm
” Try as they did, opponents could not shake the abundantly obvious fact that repealing this discriminatory and unconstitutional policy does not present the kind of “mountain lift” that many had long feared would be the case. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:12 am
TiVo was represented at the interview by counsel, but also by TiVo co-founder and ‘389 patent co-inventor Jim Barton, as well as UCLA Professor John Villasenor. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:05 am
A “John Doe” lawsuit is a civil suit filed by a plaintiff against an unknown person. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
In John Doe 1 v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
In John Doe 1 v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:34 pm
Rick’s client handled cargo and scrap metal from the DOE Oak Ridge nuclear facilities. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
John Dingell (D-MI), who has been working on food safety legislation for years, told Food Safety News yesterday. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 8:38 pm
But it does not change the rights that Clean Filcks was found to be infringing. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:31 pm
O'Neil, A Response to John T. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
At the outset, this court does not subscribe to the view that the mere accessibility of the Defendants website in Delhi would enable this Court to exercise jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:56 am
The allegedly infringed mark/trade dress (does anyone but the lawyers really think this is inherently distinctive?) [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
Justice Stevens does not point to one in his essay and, to my knowledge, the closest the Court has ever come to articulating this view was in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
