Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The Internet links to "21 CRR-NY" are set out below. 21 CRR-NY Notice Chapter I Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor Chapter II Board of Commissioners of Pilots Chapter III New York State Thruway Authority Chapter IV Syracuse Regional Airport Authority Chapter V New York State Bridge Authority Chapter VI New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying Chapter VII Nassau County Bridge Authority(Atlantic Beach… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The Internet links to "21 CRR-NY" are set out below. 21 CRR-NY Notice Chapter I Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor Chapter II Board of Commissioners of Pilots Chapter III New York State Thruway Authority Chapter IV Syracuse Regional Airport Authority Chapter V New York State Bridge Authority Chapter VI New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying Chapter VII Nassau County Bridge Authority(Atlantic Beach… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The Internet links to "21 CRR-NY" are set out below. 21 CRR-NY Notice Chapter I Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor Chapter II Board of Commissioners of Pilots Chapter III New York State Thruway Authority Chapter IV Syracuse Regional Airport Authority Chapter V New York State Bridge Authority Chapter VI New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying Chapter VII Nassau County Bridge Authority(Atlantic Beach… [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:05 pm
Chong v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
But FISA, they note, requires that the government identify a particular target, so each roving wiretap order is tied to an individual that FISC has probable cause to believe is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:14 am
Its judicial power of review can declare unconstitutional laws enacted by Congress and executive actions taken by the President of the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
Does that give the State of Arizona any powers or authority or legitimate concerns that any other State would not have? [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Barr v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:50 pm
”) (quoting Abbas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:05 am
See Frye v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:17 am
Wayman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:48 am
S., at 518–520; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:25 pm
Davis (1937), but NFIB v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am
See Department of Revenue of Ky. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:24 pm
In Grand Canyon Trust v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
In the case of Powers v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
