Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 6781 - 6800
of 23,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm
I didn't notice that. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm
Cottrell and Blaine T. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
They have a real, solid D. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
China, the United States, and Russia are left to squander muscle as they will, always subject to the legitimating judgment of this superego. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 5:24 am
Star Property Holding, LLC v Town of Islip, 2018 WL 3999666 (NYAD 2 Dept. 8/22/2018 ) [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:01 am
I made a speech I’d written that morning. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm
If I talked about the Holy Trinity doctrine, you'd know what I'm talking about, I'm sure. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:02 am
" Sam then radioed a police officer, who arrived shortly thereafter and issued defendant a citation for misdemeanor offensive littering, a Class C misdemeanor Note that some Oregon cities have ordinances expressly banning public urination, but I couldn't find any Oregon state statute that does so. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
Haldeman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
A Tаx levy, under Unіtеd States Fеdеrаl law, іѕ аn аdmіnіѕtrаtіvе асtіоn by thе Internal Revenue Service (IRS) under ѕtаtutоrу аuthоrіtу, gеnеrаllу wіthоut gоіng tо… [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:26 am
., Kaplan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:01 am
Bordo and John V. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm
., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris or BFI), petition for review docketed Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm
Additional Resources: Clark v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:56 am
"That report came a week after I had stated essentially the same thing on this blog.If I were in Qualcomm's shoes, I'd really hope Judge Curiel isn't aware of Qualcomm's investor relations announcements, such as (especially) today's news of the acceleration of its huge share repurchase program. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
So, to take just one part of the present case, you've got a state (Arizona) that does something (1) that has a huge effect compared to other states (the chart on page 78 of the opinion is indeed striking), and (2) that seems normatively like something we'd all agree we shouldn't do (at least if we didn't know which political party it benefits). [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:20 pm
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:14 pm
Israel v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:37 am
If I talked about the Holy Trinity doctrine, you'd know what I'm talking about, I'm sure. [read post]
