Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 6781 - 6800
of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 3:00 pm
"Escaping Forced Gang Recruitment: Establishing Eligibility for Asylum after Matter of S-E-G," Hastings Law Journal, vol. 63, no. 5 (2012) [full-text] Note sur la procédure de reconnaissance du droit d’asile: Allemagne, États-Uni, Italie, Pays-Bas, Royaume-Uni, Suède (France, Sénat, mars 2012) [text via Refworld] "Plight of the Boat People: How to Determine State Obligations to Asylum Seekers," Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 87, no.… [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/fwn16hqtf8 -> CISAC calls for further Canadian copyright extensions http://t.co/0q2nyqpNiY -> Link to ASCAP v Pandora 2nd Cir. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
(IP finance) Europe Cognac comes of best in spirited attack on Finns: Joined cases C-4/10 and C-27/10 Bureau national interprofessionel du Cognac v Gust. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Readers may recall I once blogged about a similar case, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:36 am
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:43 pm
For example, in CCH the Supreme Court of Canada stated: The fair dealing exception, like other exceptions in the Copyright Act, is a user’s right. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Effient products contain prasugrel hydrochloride, which is also known as 5-[(1RS)-2-cyclopropyl-1-(2-fluorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridin-2-yl acetate hydrochloride or 2-acetoxy-5-(alpha-cyclopropylcarbonyl-2-fluorobenzy1)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridine hydrochloride, and is covered by the '726 patent. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
R. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 12:08 pm
The Federal Circuit recently issued a non-precedential opinion in Vehicle IP, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am
” Here, “by committing an ever-increasing amount of State funds to paying State employee salaries or overtime,” the federal executive “can unilaterally deplete State resources, forcing the States to adopt or acquiesce to federal policies, instead of implementing State policies and priorities. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:43 am
We found the decision in Mills v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
”]; New York City Civil Court Act § 701; see also CPLR 5233[c] [“The court may direct immediate sale or other disposition of property with or without notice if the urgency of the case requires. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
Mills v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company.” This had not been done. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
By s.80(5), the claim notice was required to state the “… registered office of the RTM company.” This had not been done. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
" Kenneth R. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:59 am
First, [C]ases such as Chambers v. [read post]
