Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 6781 - 6800
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
See OB-GYN Assoc., 259 Ga. at 668(2), 386 S.E.2d 146(C). [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm
§§ 30104(b), 30116(a)(7). [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
For the reasons stated thereafter, we affirm the district court's rulings and deny all other relief requested. 07a0394p.06 2007/09/27 Amer Maritime v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:36 am
On Friday, in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am
With reference to JLR v Ineos Holdings (see IPKat analysis here), it was noted that an initial recognition figure of 32.5% was statistically significant. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Filed: September 29, 2017Opinion by: Harry C. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
Maximilian called this the “drug applicants” or “Humira” scenario, marked green.A, B and C file a priority application and only A and B claim priority in the subsequent application. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
At today’s oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
There is nothing to see but a short-term "fix" that (a) emasculates the Book of Common Prayer; (b) reverses the normal order for liturgical change; and (c) makes a mishmash of the concept of "marriage" within the Episcopal Church (USA). [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:26 pm
B. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 12:29 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm
Apple and Motorola v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 1:37 pm
This case will delve into, among other issues, when a tax payer can take a deduction for out-of-state gross receipts under Virginia Code Section 58.1-3732(B)(2), and when it is appropriate to use the default apportionment method in Virginia Code Section 58.1-3703.1(A)(3)(b) to measure the tax payer's gross receipts. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:36 am
While the Supreme Court found that a similar set of state plaintiffs met the constitution’s standing requirements in its 2007 climate change decision Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:59 pm
§ 154.071(b) (West 2011) (providing that the trial court may, in its discretion, incorporate the terms of a settlement agreement into the court’s final decree disposing of the case). [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:29 am
Div. 1987) (quoting State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
Is this bill, under Boerne v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Ontario’s Small Claims Court recently answered this question in the case of Janice Wiens v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
This language is preferable to expressing ideas, b/c not all works express ideas/have semantic content. [read post]
