Search for: "State v. Code" Results 6781 - 6800 of 27,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2021, 3:20 pm by Unknown
""At the case management conference on January 13, 2020, the court dismissed the petition without prejudice pursuant to Probate Code[2] sections 17202 and 17206. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Bank Failure Resource Kit assembles Practical Guidance resources covering topics related to the recent bank failures. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 OATH, however, had  affirmed so much of the hearing officer's determination as directed the Petitioner to pay a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for a period of 39 days from November 9, 2019, to December 17, 2019, December 17, 2019 being "the date the violation was corrected according to a sworn certificate of correction of the Petitioner's owner".Citing Matter of Call-A-Head Portable Toilets, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:20 pm by Unknown
""At the case management conference on January 13, 2020, the court dismissed the petition without prejudice pursuant to Probate Code[2] sections 17202 and 17206. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 11:07 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Like most states, Illinois has a system in place to protect injured workers when a workers comp insurer goes bankrupt. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Bank Failure Resource Kit assembles Practical Guidance resources covering topics related to the recent bank failures. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 7:22 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in Fort Des Moines Church of Christ v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:47 am by John Jascob
The Commission could not compel former bank employees to divulge the secret passcodes they devised for smartphones issued to them by their former bank employer because the codes were the employees’ personal thought processes and not business records that can be compelled over Fifth Amendment objection (SEC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 OATH, however, had  affirmed so much of the hearing officer's determination as directed the Petitioner to pay a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for a period of 39 days from November 9, 2019, to December 17, 2019, December 17, 2019 being "the date the violation was corrected according to a sworn certificate of correction of the Petitioner's owner".Citing Matter of Call-A-Head Portable Toilets, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]