Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 6781 - 6800
of 8,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
After reviewing the case’s background and basic CEQA principles, the Court stated: “[W]e have no trouble concluding [Petitioner] Save Berkeley has stated a valid cause of action. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
” Conspicuously absent from this portion of the opinion’s discussion is any mention of the legislative intent underlying the 90-day filing and service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1), its plain language stating it applies to bar “all persons” from “any further action or proceeding” after it expires (§ 65009(e)), and its expressly stated intent not to displace shorter statutes of limitations. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:38 am
Aeroquip Credit Union, 936 F.3d 489, 493 (6th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted); see also Griffin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. iv. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
We commended that procedure in Clarke, 94 F.4th at 507 n.1. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Lynch, No. 05-6048 Criminal possession of a weapon and attempted burglary are each considered "violent felonies" under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. 924(e) to justify a statutory minimum of fifteen years' imprisonment when there are three prior violent felony convictions. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
§ 2.122(e)(2)]. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
Super. 2006), and Schindler v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
(f); Legis. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
Escobar, 780 F. 3d 504 (1st Cir. 2015), the Court definitely took a run through the weeds. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 8:05 pm
Court Rules, comment 6.1 to R. 2:5-1(f)(1); Campagna v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 4:31 am
SC07-1499 v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
But the clip nevertheless underscores the problem with objectified intolerance. _____________________________________________________________ (1) Prior to a post-conviction evidentiary hearing in State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
Deluxe Corp., 222 F. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
Deluxe Corp., 222 F. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
This is very much like patenting E=mc2 . [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 2:36 pm
" First, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:25 pm
Rosner upon their arrival at John F. [read post]
