Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:22 pm
In Truman v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am
To that list, the brief could have added the gas station rent control measure in Lingle v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 3:11 pm
Gregg v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses last week’s decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
See Willemsen v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
See Willemsen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Speaking of the 10th District, last week in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:49 pm
State v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:19 am
Bowman v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:05 pm
The parties are requested to file simultaneous briefs setting forth their respective positions on whether this case should be reheard en banc, including whether rehearing en banc is warranted in light of Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
"Clear enough.But then the Supreme Court held in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:14 am
In light of that testimony, the court declined to enforce the buyout agreement. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:31 pm
See also Martinez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
Instead, it merely held that, in light of the ongoing reconciliation process, the sale of ceded lands would constitute a breach of the State's fiduciary duty to Native Hawaiians under state law. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:32 am
But in light of the abundance of case law holding otherwise, Dunning's warrantless search argument fails.U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
They correctly invoke Hunt v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am
” United States v. [read post]
