Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 6781 - 6800 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The Gelboim-Zacher action was one of over sixty actions filed in districts in thirteen states; these other actions included antitrust claims as well as other state and federal claims. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Stefanie Levine
" NIH in the 21st Century: the Director's Perspective, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives, 17 (June 15, 2010) (Francis S. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Stefanie Levine
" NIH in the 21st Century: the Director's Perspective, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives, 17 (June 15, 2010) (Francis S. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Cicely Wilson
Islamic Republic of Iran US DC Cir (Filed 02/28/2012) McKesson, a United States company, claimed that after the Islamic Revolution, the government of Iran expropriated McKesson’s interest in an Iranian dairy (Pak Dairy) and withheld its dividend payments. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Cicely Wilson
Islamic Republic of Iran US DC Cir (Filed 02/28/2012) McKesson, a United States company, claimed that after the Islamic Revolution, the government of Iran expropriated McKesson’s interest in an Iranian dairy (Pak Dairy) and withheld its dividend payments. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
” Therefore, he is being held in violation of his rights under the Due Process Clause and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
During that time, a traveler may come to the United States repeatedly withouthaving to apply for another ESTA. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
 The court held that the petitioners had not exhausted their administrative remedies on the issue of breaking up the impacts because the citations referenced in petitioner’s brief were general allegations and not specific enough to alert the City to the alleged inadequacy. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:14 am
" See Brief for Petitioners 21; Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 6. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 9:21 am by Alexandra L. Arko
The respective district and United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed the claims, citing Google’s immunity under Section 230. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
United States, 713 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:35 am by Raymond Millien
Two weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court decided to hear another patent case[1] – marking only the ninth time during the Chief Justice Roberts era that Court has decided to do so. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 10:59 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:15 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]