Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
United StatesDocket: 10-794Issue(s): When a court allocates the proceeds from a sale pursuant to 26 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:53 pm
United States; and Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:20 am
Put simply, United States held on to its NME negotiating stock too long, and it just crashed. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:22 am
” The United States would retain its current authority to bring false marking claims and recover up to $500 per article. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:44 pm
Wieczorek on this issue: “WHETHER THE UNITED STATES MAINTAINS JURISDICTION OVER PETITIONER? [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
Noncapital United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas, 2011 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 pm
United States, No. 10-922, is scheduled to go to Conference this Friday. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
It is also not as if declining jurisdiction in the case would have left the petitioner without recourse. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:15 am
Yesterday, the WTO's Appellate Body delivered a pretty significant smackdown on the United States in its dispute with China over the US imposition of anti-dumping (AD) duties and countervailing duties (CVDs) on Chinese imports. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:14 pm
In the oldie but goodie department, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Counsel Advisory Opinion Unit issued an Advisory Opinion in December 2009, for PETITION NO. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:10 pm
Unfortunately, nearly 200 years later, slavery lingered in the United States, and, in 1851, feminist abolitionist and former slave Sojourner Truth delivered her famous "Ain't I A Woman? [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
Answer: Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
United States (9th Cir. 1984). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
In truth, the majority provides a roadmap for any unsuccessful state habeas petitioner to relitigate his claim under §1983: After state habeas is denied, file a §1983 suit challenging the state habeas process rather than the result. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
The Court’s refusal to consider the case means states are left to decide the issue of whether workers who entered the United States illegally may benefit from workers’ compensation coverage. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
A 1994 United States statute pursuant to international agreements restored copyright protection to thousands of works that had made it to the public domain through the march of statutory time. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Petitioner’s reply [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
Whether the removal of those works from the public domain violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
