Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
California Registered IA. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Feb. 25, 2014) Charles Munger, Jr. is an active force in reshaping the Republican Party in California. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
It can probably manage C:\dir > print.txt United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
This post reviews some of the highlights of the court battles of 2014 in Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the United States and the European Union. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
United States even where Congress is exercising its Commerce Clause powers. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted a defendant’s motion to decertify a class because plaintiff’s damages model was not consistent with his theory of liability as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
All these actions – many hundreds of plaintiffs – were filed in various California state trial courts. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:51 am
” Volokh thinks DiRosa’s post—even if it advocates murder—advocates murder at some indefinite future time, making it protected speech pursuant to a pair of United States Supreme Court decisions—Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:02 am
Priority right is defined as the right of [Zuckerman] to first right of refusal to use or market seed of the [v]ariety in California, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
” The lawsuit is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
In Jones v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
According to the United States Supreme Court, the answer is yes. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:15 am
On December 15, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in Heien v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
On Friday, President Obama told the nation that the United States will respond “proportionately” to the cyberattack against Sony, which his administration is crediting to North Korea. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
A “canine unit entered the house and [Moreno] came out . . . and was arrested. [read post]
