Search for: "B. R."
Results 6801 - 6820
of 53,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2019, 3:12 pm
Thapar came out in favor, while Circuit Judge Jane B. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
" The DOJ's motion provided neither (a) nor (b), and yesterday—unsurprisingly, and correctly—Judge Furman denied the motion. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:03 am
R. 7A. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:40 pm
The trial court also granted summary judgment to Serco on the conspiracy claims, finding that (a) they were time-barred under the 5-year statute of limitations, and (b) the lack of a valid business expectancy precluded any liability for statutory or common-law conspiracy. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:44 am
It: establishes specific notice and verification requirements for employees who are civil patrol members; specifies that its provisions must not be construed to prohibit an employer from (a) treating the employee’s absence as unpaid time off or (b) complying with a collective bargaining agreement or employee benefit plan entered into before October 1, 2019; and specifically allows an aggrieved employee to sue to recover damages and equitable relief in the Superior Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:24 am
[B.] [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
B h3 R ac8 30. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am
Centennial Chair in Law, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Steven Lubet, Edna B. and Ednyfed H. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:40 am
Sprechen objektive und wichtige Gründe für eine längere Aufbewahrungsdauer, so kann diese angemessen verlängert werden. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:09 am
• Richard B. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:49 am
Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) by introducing the Protecting Personal Health Data Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:42 am
The court additionally found that the plaintiff's bare bones and conclusory allegations of bad faith were insufficient to survive the F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss challenge.Please click this LINK to view the O'Brien decision.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:29 pm
Dewey B Strategic readers voted the new Bloomberg pricing as the worst legal publishing development of 2018. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Ellen Bennett, Mark R. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:52 am
Lisa R. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:39 am
” The committee will call R. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
Their Supreme Court brief explained: "Here, likewise, Private Respondents are not preemptively defending against the 'penalty' that § 5000A(b) would impose [in 2014] if they were to violate the mandate, but instead are attacking § 5000A(a)'s unconditional legal "[r]equirement" to purchase insurance in the first place. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:44 pm
The defendants moved the District Court to dismiss all counts under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), alleging that the patents did not meet the eligibility requirements of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
§ 5000A(b), is distinct from the Individual Mandate, id. [read post]
