Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 6801 - 6820 of 21,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm by Tara Hofbauer
Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Jeff Flake (R-AZ) have introduced an amendment to the State Department policy bill authorizing the use of military force against the Islamic State. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Last month, the Michigan legislature passed bills creating its first-ever statewide public defense system and, today, Governor Rick Snyder signed the bills into law. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:43 pm by Elizabeth Hampton
The decision will have a profound effect on federal and state courts who are increasingly confronted with billing disputes and fraud claims against providers. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am by Ron Coleman
This should be the subject of national, not local, policy — a decision for Congress, not state legislatures. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Rosenblat
The definition of public disclosure was recently addressed in the case of United States, et al. v. [read post]
Photo by Soumil Kumar on Pexels.comBy: HR Fitzmorris The Supreme Court recently granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in Dubin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
In Billings v Michigan Ability Partners, the Court reversed the part of the Court of Appeals decision that reinstated the plaintiff’s claim of discrimination under the Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
She one time stated that "Middle Easterners are lazy" and complained to a co-worker when "another one" was hired. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]