Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 6801 - 6820 of 8,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Bryant and Cohen both highlighted the developing doctrine that federal regulation preempts state laws and state courts as a threat to the legal system. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 8:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Justice Stevens had a similar epiphany in the case of Baze v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
" Congress also has the power to investigate the workings of the Executive branch simply to determine whether legislative amendments are necessary in order prevent or deter undesirable government practices, and perhaps even for the basic function of facilitating "the American people's ability to reconstruct and come to terms with their history," Nixon v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
But if it ever did, then of course what the United States itself argued about attorney culpability in the Justice Case could be pertinent to any claims and defenses raised in such an international tribunal.4. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am by Robert Brammer
It became a prominent militant branch of the suffragettes, with the motto “deeds, not words. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
  He said that the Supreme Court, in its June 12 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:45 am by admin
The Competition Tribunal has now issued its decision, which now sheds light on the reasoning for its dismissal of the Bureau’s abuse case against Canada’s largest real estate board (see: The Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
Part V of that Act provides a legislative framework for legal services including advocacy to be offered by businesses consisting of lawyers and non-lawyers. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. [read post]