Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 6801 - 6820 of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Alice Woolley
We emphasize that this does not deprive the judge of a remedy where procedural or fairness issues arise in an inquiry, just that the sui generis judicial conduct process under the Judges Act has built into it a mechanism (by way of appeal from the Committee to the Council at the end of the inquiry process) to address those issues through the Council which is itself a superior court. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
            In our post on the worst decisions of 2013, we highlighted two trilogies of dreck, the First Circuit’s Neurontindecisions and the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s Reglan decisions. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by Susan Brenner
This judge, then, reached the same result a Massachusetts district court judge reached in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:58 am by Jonathan Holbrook
[…] Thus the judgments of conviction based on the involuntary pleas of guilty are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm by Joe Price
  Defendants and insurance companies have fought the law without success since it passed including the leading case of Guadio v Ford Motor Company a case out of Pike County decided by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in 2009. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:35 am by Dianne Saxe
According to the Superior Court of Justice, the flying piece of rock was indeed a “contaminant” discharged into the natural environment, just like windblown sand in R. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm by nflatow
Doe, the watershed Supreme Court decision that required Texas to give undocumented children free access to public schools. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:30 am
Faced with a feuding couple who had “been marinating in a mutual hatred so intense as to surely amount to a personality disorder requiring treatment”, Justice Quinn, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, decided in the case of Bruni –v-Bruni that “the parties repeatedly have shown that they are immune to reason. [read post]