Search for: "English v. English" Results 6801 - 6820 of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm by David Hart QC
Buglife, R (on the application of) v Natural England [2011] EWHC 746 (Admin) – Read judgment All public lawyers know that judicial review must be commenced “promptly and in any event not later than 3 months” after the public act complained of, failing which a claimant is at the mercy of the court as to whether to extend time. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:10 am by Adam Wagner
The Judge examined the European and English authorities, and spell out the obligation for authorities: 51. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by David Hart QC
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011 When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 6:54 am by Ari Ezra Waldman
The question is: Per Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:33 am by Marie Louise
: AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: WFU law professor says Federal Circuit failed as “keeper of the Constitution” in AMP v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm by Marie Louise
: Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v Roche Molecular Systems Inc (IPKat) US: That was unexpectedly…  well… expected: BPAI affirms Examiner’s obviousness rejection in Ex Parte Akio Ochiai concerning a health food product containing curcumin, scymnol and isoflavones (BT-IP Notes) US: VirginiaTech VERSUS series – Drug evaluation DVDs available (FDA Law Blog) Products Diovan HCT (Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide) – Germany:… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 8:40 am
By contrast, the portions of the law that relate to limitations on reimbursement for unilateral placement in a private school specifically provide that where a parent is illiterate or cannot write in English, the court or hearing officer may in their discretion consider these factors in whether to reduce or deny reimbursement for failure to provide written notice to the LEA. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm by Mairead Enright
Finally, the report argues that sharia tribunals often operate otherwise than as a private religious supplement to the civil legal system, that councils may make decisions which explicitly contradict the provisions of English law, even in areas such as child custody and that they may, in particular, claim religious authority to do so. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm by Giles Peaker
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
12 May 2019, 2:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
To illustrate, Justice Myers in Jarvis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm by Giles Peaker
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
 So were people who bought Greek decoders, imported them into England and used them for watching English Premier League football matches infringing copyright or anti-decryption rules -- or was it the FAPL and its cohorts which were the villains for perpetrating anti-competitive practices and dividing up the European Union into separate national markets? [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:43 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In fact the Swiss Private International Law Act 1987 and the English Arbitration Act, 1996 have dropped off "only"  as well.4. [read post]