Search for: "House v. State"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 25,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2022, 12:13 pm
Facts: This case (Peters v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:25 am
Cuban concludes his post by stating: “I hope Yahoo[!] [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm
United States, the climate lawsuit brought by 21 youth plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:28 pm
Supreme Court struck down the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman under the federal Defense of Marriage Act in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" In Powell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:54 am
The Special Task Force shall consist of the following members, or their designees:(i) the Attorney General, who shall serve as Co-Chair;(ii) the Secretary of Defense, who shall serve as Co-Chair;(iii) the Secretary of State;(iv) the Secretary of Homeland Security;(v) the Director of National Intelligence;(vi) the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;(vii) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and(viii) other officers or full-time or permanent… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Dominic Choate v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Fowler v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
This is the way the Justices put it in the 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:18 pm
Woods v Harrington, Haverfordwest County Court. 19 May 2009. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
New York would seem to establish a point on a spectrum of deference to agencies’ stated rationales, opposite that of Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
House of Representatives. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm
The 6-3 decision in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:58 am
Griesbach on a pending suppression motion in United States v. [read post]
