Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 15,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
The Ruitenberg bankruptcy court judge recognized that he had ruled otherwise in the case of In re Howell, 311 B.R. 173 (D. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 5:54 pm
In addition, they had the novel idea of highlighting judges precedential history – what cases do specific judges tend to cite for particular issues and then how do they rule? [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
The exact same regulatory text that existed prior to 2015 Rule (that gain never went into effect), which reflects the current legal regime under which the agencies are operating, would be re-codified in the Code of Federal Regulations. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm
(Yes but it isn’t required.) and (2) What, if any, legal entity should I form? [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm
(Yes but it isn’t required.) and (2) What, if any, legal entity should I form? [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:05 pm
Pursuant to a procedure detailed in House rules, the memo was released to the public following signoff from the intelligence committee Republicans and the president. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am
That's it: No legal analysis, no explanation of why the First Amendment and common-law rights of access don't apply, why they're trumped by some overriding interest, or anything else. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
The United Nations continues this work through its many mandate holders. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
But after Todd announced she will not run for re-election, she received an offer from the Consumer Financial Education Foundation of America which she accepted. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm
The pleading rules in state court are often more lenient to plaintiffs than the Federal rules. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:50 am
The military commission continued admitting pre-trial evidence and addressed the ongoing absence of the majority of the defendant’s legal team. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
It is timely for the ABA to add its voice to this growing international consensus, which would be consistent with the ABA’s far-ranging work in the rule of law and human rights and its existing policy on corporate citizenship. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:05 am
If you have told a debt collector not to call you at work and they continue to do so, you can take legal action against them. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 11:22 am
The rule finalizes the scope and requirements for permitted disclosures to contractors, subcontractors and legal representatives, highlighting that such disclosure is never allowed for diagnosis, treatment or referral purposes. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 am
Even thin FCA cases can drag on for years, as courts tend to liberally allow relators at least one opportunity to re-plead their case after an initial dismissal. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
You’re not happy. [read post]
Private Censorship Is Not the Best Way to Fight Hate or Defend Democracy: Here Are Some Better Ideas
30 Jan 2018, 9:51 am
Or they’re things some users want to read and others don’t. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia first recognized the standard of review in bankruptcy appeals: fact findings would be set aside if clearly erroneous, citing Bankruptcy Rule 8013, and legal issues, or mixed issues of law and fact, were decided de novo, citing In re: Johnson, Canal Corp v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia first recognized the standard of review in bankruptcy appeals: fact findings would be set aside if clearly erroneous, citing Bankruptcy Rule 8013, and legal issues, or mixed issues of law and fact, were decided de novo, citing In re: Johnson, Canal Corp v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia first recognized the standard of review in bankruptcy appeals: fact findings would be set aside if clearly erroneous, citing Bankruptcy Rule 8013, and legal issues, or mixed issues of law and fact, were decided de novo, citing In re: Johnson, Canal Corp v. [read post]
