Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 7,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2009, 5:12 pm
The OHCHR report reaches several important conclusions: (1) climate change threatens the enjoyment of a broad array of human rights; (2) climate change does not, however, necessarily violate human rights law; (3) human rights law nevertheless places duties on states concerning climate change; and (4) those duties include an obligation of international cooperation. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:51 am
Rule 41(f)(1). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:58 pm
That does not appear to be Sen's position. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:12 pm
The information laid in January 2008 stated: On 30th July 2007, being the manager of JD Sports of 2-4 St Johns Road, SW11 and the producer of controlled waste, you failed in your duty to take all such measure applicable to you in that capacity as are reasonable in the circumstances to prevent the escape of waste from your control or that of any other person contrary to Section 34(1)(b) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in that your trade waste, namely a pile of… [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 8:00 pm
In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls distinguishes three very general and abstract kinds of procedural justice: (1) perfect procedural justice, (2) imperfect procedural justice, and (3) pure procedural justice. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Sawyer’s dose calculation did not survive for three reasons: (1) he cherry-picked a non-representative study from which to base his overall calculation, (2) he cherry-picked an exposure value (and the less reliable value) from within that study, and (3) his calculation was full of factual errors. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Sawyer’s dose calculation did not survive for three reasons: (1) he cherry-picked a non-representative study from which to base his overall calculation, (2) he cherry-picked an exposure value (and the less reliable value) from within that study, and (3) his calculation was full of factual errors. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Sawyer’s dose calculation did not survive for three reasons: (1) he cherry-picked a non-representative study from which to base his overall calculation, (2) he cherry-picked an exposure value (and the less reliable value) from within that study, and (3) his calculation was full of factual errors. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 11:07 pm
Suffice it to say that (factor 1) the identity of the marks weighed heavily in favor of the Section 2(d) refusal. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:31 pm
In his opening statement to the Subcommittee, Senator Hatch detailed his concerns that the BCS violated both Section 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act: “Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act prohibits contracts, combinations, or conspiracies to limit competition. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3, John Does 4-10, Ustream TV Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 6:37 am
Officer John Renbarger participated in the execution of a search warrant that was based on the [*2] crime of altering a vehicle identification number ("VIN"). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:34 am
I’ll pretty much go with what’s behind Door No. 2 on that one, too. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:46 am
Stateof Punjab [(1983) 2 SCC 277]. 2. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:20 pm
It seems to me that the design in question is indeed so simple as to be the cheapest way to provide the particular utilitarian features of a bird feeder.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:52 am
(go back) [2] See SEC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:58 pm
July 21, 2009 1). [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
United States, 86 Cr. 1 (LLS), 1987 WL 9705 at *2 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:42 am
FTC Staff Revises Online Behavioral Advertising Principles (2/2/09). [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
Second, the Court of Chancery held that the minority stockholders are entitled to a quasi-appraisal remedy if: (1) Pubco makes additional disclosures, (2) minority stockholders choose to opt into the action, (3) the appraisal is structured so that stockholders escrow a portion of the merger consideration and (4) the shares are valued as of the date of the merger. [read post]
