Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 9:04 am
In February, in the case of Clapper v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:53 am
” SEC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:36 am
Guido v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:38 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Farnes, 697 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla. 1997) (FDA-approved label provided “an evidentiary basis for the jury verdict”); Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am
An Introduction to Listeria Listeria (pronounced liss-STEER-ē-uh) is a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium that can grow under either anaerobic (without oxygen) or aerobic (with oxygen) conditions. [4, 18] Of the six species of Listeria, only L. monocytogenes (pronounced maw-NO-site-aw-JUH-neez) causes disease in humans. [18] These bacteria multiply best at 86-98.6 degrees F (30-37 degrees C), but also multiply better than all other bacteria at refrigerator temperatures, something that allows… [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
No, this is not another screed about off-label use, although it’s related. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 1:46 pm
At which point Huizar-Velazquez bought a bunch of wire hangers from China, imported them into Mexico, put 'em into boxes labeled "Made in Mexico," and shipped them to the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Palmer v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Similarly in, Quinlan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:09 pm
From a June 15, Reuters article "Plaintiff lawyers seek a new lifeline in medical device cases" (accessed 6/18/13; paid subscription required now): Plaintiff lawyers are trying a new strategy to get around a 2008 Supreme Court ruling [Riegel v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:49 am
It cites to the Ninth Circuit's 2001 decision in Scribner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am
Unfortunately I still saw some rather recent articles about Apple v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
In the recent Maryland case of Fusco v Shannon, the Court of Special Appeals held that a pharmacist was qualified to testify regarding off label use of a prescription drug in an medical malpractice informed consent case. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:16 am
First, in 2009 in Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
District http://t.co/pRretycdAF -> Antonick v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:02 am
The court in Saavedra v. [read post]
