Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 39,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 1:38 am
The Judge followed the reasoning of Lord Justice Kitchin (as then was) in Tulane v Comptroller ([2013] EWCA Civ 890), that the lump fees were “annual fees” as specified by Article 14. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 12:24 am
The Appellate Division, Second Department’s opinion last week in PFT Technology, LLC v Wieser, 2020 NY Slip Op 01942 [2d Dept Mar. 18, 2020], is one of those. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 9:27 pm
At the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, it actually worked (with a little... [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 6:12 am
Attorney Christopher Clark scoffed at the idea that Ahmed sought as little as five years in prison while citing his devotion to his son as a basis for leniency, highlighting that he was “providing heroin to his girlfriend who was bearing his son. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
Innermost Ltd v Warm BL O/464/19 is that rare thing, a case about licensing of right under Part III of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
Innermost Ltd v Warm BL O/464/19 is that rare thing, a case about licensing of right under Part III of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 9:45 am
Several nongovernmental organizations challenged the constitutionality of the regulations in the Israeli High Court of Justice, which issued an interim order in Ben Meir v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 8:36 am
With today’s technology, however, there is a little difference between in-person depositions and videoconference depositions, at least for evaluating and reacting to a witness’ demeanor. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 8:00 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:06 am
United KingdomShakir Ali v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Georgia declared implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 5:14 am
In Pagliara v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:36 pm
It's a tiny little fight between one judge who wants the opinion -- which involves an unsettled state law issue -- either to be unpublished (and hence nonprecedential) or to have the federal courts certify the question this time and/or the next time it comes up. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:53 am
Disclosure: I am arguing counsel in one of the March cases, Google v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
$12 Million Jury Verdict for Birth Injury Caused by Failure to Discontinue Blood Pressure Medication
19 Mar 2020, 8:00 am
Franklin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:43 am
Entertainment Content, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm
Force majeure clauses typically break between suspending performance for a period of time and allowing the parties to terminate the contract, with little or no penalty. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
