Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 29,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2015, 5:34 am
After the historic 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:47 am
In the case of Dausab v The Minister of Justice, applicant Friedel Dausab, a Namibian gay man working as an LGBTQ rights activist, stated that he endured hardship by openly living as a gay man. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
US court has no personal jurisdiction over vendor with website with minimum sales in state BIOTECH v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
At 0900, the fun resumes at Fort Meade’s Smallwood Hall, where (as always) your correspondent will view, via CCTV, pre-trial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:59 am
MR v North Tyneside Council and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Housing and council tax benefits : other) [2015] UKUT 34 (AAC) The FTT in this case had found that the tenant was entitled to an ‘extra’ bedroom, as under a shared residence order, her son spent alternate weeks with her. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
See Dalessio v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
Vaughn v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:11 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
You may file your case while you're still living together, but you must live separate and apart for two years before the case can be finalized. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Balzourt v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
This left people with the option to set up residency in other states in order to qualify to file for divorce jurisdictionally, which takes 60-90 days and an intent to reside there indefinitely.Fortunately for these couples, the recent United States Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:25 am
The oral argument in Golan v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
’ Davies v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:13 am
The decision is Pinti v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
County (2013) and NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:50 am
I hope to blog a good deal about today's Janus v. [read post]
