Search for: "MATTER OF BROWN" Results 6801 - 6820 of 9,010
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Mac
Was it the subject matter that made it so interesting? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:33 am by Victoria Pynchon
On the other hand, if you think you can fool her with a false bottom line, you are a brown belt and may proceed. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:23 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/657ssvr (Paul Doscher) Senators Explore New Website Seizure Options – http://tinyurl.com/46gucqq (Grant Gross) SSDs Prove Tough To Erase - http://tinyurl.com/5t5b2xg (Mathew Schwartz) Take It From a Former In-House Counsel: The Numbers and Metrics That Matter - http://tinyurl.com/6bs6jzc (Jason Mark Anderman) US Cities Using Private Cloud to Share Services – http://tinyurl.com/6xol593 (Xinhui Guo) Who Rules the Web Now? [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
The finding must be elevated above the “probable” level set out in s 140(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 to consider the matters contemplated in s 140(2) of that Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:45 am by Intelligent Challenge
Two of the original members (Brown and Isaacs) went on to document their deep underlying research, the key principles and a host of great case studies in their book, “The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter”. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm by Steve Vladeck
Circuit (Judges Brown, Kavanaugh, and Randolph, in particular) will apparently find any way in any case to adopt holdings that (1) go beyond even what the government is asking for in these cases (see, e.g., Randolph's lament about the standard of review in Al-Adahi); and (2) are indefensible as a matter of law and logic, is anyone else on that court going to notice? [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:12 am by admin
The CSPI has called for the production of caramel colouring using ammonia to be banned as a matter of public safety. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am by INFORRM
Articles & Discussion Redefining the Defence of Fair Comment Amber Melville-Brown (Withers). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:33 am by war
However, that does not take the matter far. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
As such, we are not persuaded that the Examiner erred in concluding that the disclosures of Eich and Matsuno render obvious the subject matter of claim 9. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm by Amanda Beck
  The court also said that it would expedite the matter and require submission of the parties’ first briefs in March. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm by Amanda Beck
  The court also said that it would expedite the matter and require submission of the parties’ first briefs in March. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:19 pm by Hull and Hull LLP
There, the matter involved several hundred parties. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by Steve Bainbridge
Jay Brown: The court emphatically concluded that it was not validating the "just say no" approach to tender offers. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
*Jim Brown, a teacher, sued James Simmons, the superintendent of the Conway (Arkansas) Public School District, alleging that Simmons infringed Brown’s procedural due process rights by denying him a name-clearing hearing. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Co., 71 S.W.3d 691 (Tenn. 2002) (declining to extend privilege to clams for intentional interference with business relationships absent any claims for defamation); Brown v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:26 pm
Additionally, U.S Senator Scott Brown has called for a complete investigation of this shooting death. [read post]