Search for: "Mark E. Howe"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 7,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 11:06 am
Just how messy is it? [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:21 am
As the e-marketplace becomes increasingly crowded, the demand for more space becomes correspondingly more urgent. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
(See the bottom of this post for information about how to read the audit logs.) [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:20 am
How are GCs managing corporate risk if they do not know the liability of pending suits? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
Inc v OnlineNIC, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) (Class 46) (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Facebook - Facebook sues social networking aggregator Power.com for trade mark and copyright infringement, unlawful competition (Techdirt) (Out-Law) (Law360) Perez Hilton - Gossip website Perez Hilton sues PerezRevenge.com on trade mark and ‘frivolous’ DMCA cause (The Trademark… [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:48 pm
The Globe's Mark Blaudschun has this story on how DeFilippo felt betrayed, while Globe columnist Dan Shaughnessy decries the trend of sports figures failing to live up to their contracts. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:17 am
Basic courses are delivered via e-mail and consists of e-mail lessons with a text lecture, further resources, and a self-marking quiz. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 8:01 am
Amer appeals every final refusal, no matter how formidable the challenge. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:39 pm
So we don't really care how the school's teams are doing.Unless they're doing well. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
(How would that be enforced?) [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Loufrani, Oppositions Nos. 91150278, 91154632, and 91152145 [Two Wal-Mart oppositions to registration of the SMILEY & Design mark shown below left (face design disclaimed) for hundreds of identified goods and services, on the grounds of likely confusion with Opposer's previously-used design mark (below right) and failure to function as a mark (lack of inherent distinctiveness); Loufrani opposition to registration of the design mark shown below right… [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 8:39 am
Schulman and Julian E. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
. --------------------------------------- Aliens admitted on an A-1, A-2, C-3 (except for attendants, servants, or personal employees of accredited officials), G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, NATO-1, NATO-2, NATO-3, NATO-4, NATO-5, or NATO-6 visa; Children under the age of 14; Persons over the age of 79; Taiwan officials admitted on an E-1 visa and members of their immediate families admitted on E-1 visas. 8 CFR 235.1(f)(1)(iv).2 In addition, the Secretary of State and Secretary of Homeland… [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:38 am
We are taught in law school the importance of a signature and the legal ramifications of one’s mark on a document. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 4:00 am
"The determination of whether the stylization of an otherwise unregistrable designation is sufficiently distinctive in character to "rescue" the designation as a whole is a subjective one.The Board compared the GRUNGE mark to the four marks shown below, each of which was previously found to have an inherently distinctive stylization:So how did it come out? [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
One pending question is how will the courts apply the new rule? [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 3:47 pm
Mark Carusowww.carusolaw.com [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 11:14 am
Mark Caruso is a former insurance company attorney, and we know how insurance companies think and act. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Thanks so much for this -- and please feel free to pass this e-mail on to others who might like to support CC. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:44 pm
If it functions as a mark how can it be abandoned, which is defined as losing significance as a mark? [read post]
