Search for: "People v. Case" Results 6801 - 6820 of 51,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2021, 3:55 pm by Joe Austin, E.D. Tenn.
After initially deciding the case in an unpublished order, the Sixth Circuit later ordered publication of its decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Paxton, which is much like the briefs we filed in a couple of previous cases (Arkansas Times LP v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:52 pm
  The case has people all atwitter. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by SHG
  None of the sexy stuff that people routinely associate with criminal law. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Yesterday I was doing an oral argument before the Court of Appeal in a pro bono case and there were two cases before mine, so -- having nothing else to do -- I listened intently. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It says all people must be treated equally by the government, but the government actually has leeway in regulating people and industries differently, so long as those distinctions are not irrational as a matter of law.The case is Progressive Credit Union v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Court holds 6-2 that the evidence in this case was not material.Weaver v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On the consent of the People and pursuant to People v Dunaway, Mapp v Ohio and People v Huntley, a hearing was held in this matter on 19 October 2012. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:46 am by Duets Guest Blogger
  The post Caribou v Blue Caribou : Doing things right the first time. appeared first on DuetsBlog. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
EFF – Cindy Cohn:  “NSA Spying: Government’s Latest Delay Tactic Fails The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today rejected the government’s latest attempt to delay consideration of whether the NSA’s tapping into the Internet backbone is legal in Jewel v. [read post]