Search for: "Register of Copyrights" Results 6801 - 6820 of 12,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Perhaps the CAFC will have an opportunity to look at this case.Text and Photograph Copyright John L. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:21 am by John L. Welch
I would have given Useful the benefit of the doubt on this one.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
"In conclusion, the Board found the mark to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive, and it affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:59 am by John L. Welch
It could have won this case in a breeze, but it lurched and sputtered across the finish line, more like a Corvair than a Corvette.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 5:00 am
In its 33rd citable decision of 2006, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(2) refusal to register the mark BAIKALSKAYA for vodka, finding the mark to be primarily geographically descriptive. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
Tsubaki, Inc., TTABlogged here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
[I guess I'm still bitter about the TTABLOG case].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm by John L. Welch
Section 1071(b), which would provide Swatch with a trial de novo where it may submit the testimony excluded by the Board.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
.'s specimen of use unacceptable, and so affirmed a refusal to register the mark TSUBAKI: THE CHOICE FOR CHAIN for machines and various machine parts. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:42 am
Along with the IP ADR Blog's Victoria Pynchon, I am giving an ALI-ABA continuing legal education teleconference discussing alternative dispute resolution as a low-cost alternative for intellectual property disputes -- click here to register. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:08 pm
It affirmed a Section 2(e)(4) refusal to register, finding the mark to be primarily merely a surname. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 pm
Applicant Eolith's appellate gamble paid off when the Board reversed the PTO's refusal to register EL DORADO for "computer electronic games; automatic slot machines. [read post]