Search for: "STATE v. SMITH" Results 6801 - 6820 of 10,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 8:55 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week in Monge et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:51 am
No matter, for now the established jurisprudence the rest of the country must follow regarding the execution of the retarded and mentally ill still applies to the Lone Star State - so long, that is, as our current president does not enjoy one more Supreme Court appointment before the end of his term.Capital Defense Weekly called the trio of death penalty rulings today a "sweep" for the UT Austin Capital Punishment Clinic.The majority opinion called the Texas Court of Criminal… [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB).Tattoo artist William Hay took libel action against Nina Cresswell, a woman who published a blog and social media posts stating that he had violently sexually assaulted her 10 years earlier. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am by Adam Klasfeld
Instead, Smith leveled four charges that focused more narrowly on Trump’s multi-state false electors scheme and the pressure campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to count those fraudulent electoral votes: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstructing an official proceeding, and violating a Reconstruction-era civil rights law, drafted originally to protect formerly enslaved people through criminal sanction. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am by Michael Webster
But, once somewhere on the web, Godin stated that his preferred length of email response was three lines. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1569 Title: United States v. [read post]