Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 121,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:14 pm
Plus, while the election in the first round of Ariel Fernandez to the seat in Group V is a blow to the attempt to create a pro-development Mayoral electoral and money machine, it would be good to finish the job. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 12:01 pm
At the time of writing this post, this Kat was currently halfway through Mr Justice Mellor’s Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND decision (see here) this Kat is made aware of an appellant judgment from the High Court of Delhi in the same area: Intex v Ericsson 2023:DHC:2243-DB. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
As Gorsuch writes: As the Court sees it, Ms. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v EMC Mtge. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v EMC Mtge. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
See also Doe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm
Div. 2002); see also Viscik v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm
See, for example, these descriptions of Justices Gorsuch, Kagan, Alito, Kavanaugh Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, Coney-Barrett, Brown Jackson, Scalia all use the same word: “affable. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:48 pm
We see that the safeguards, rather than being an obstacle to such cooperation, should really be seen as enabling. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:25 pm
The original and most established version from Griswold v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 8:48 am
Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1240 v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:25 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:25 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:24 am
The Argentine case: suspension of pediatric vaccination COVID-19 On November 30, 2022, Federal Court No. 4 of Mar del Plata decided the case “Carrillo Couhez, María Alicia Noemí and Others v/ National Executive Power and others/ Collective Amparo” (File No. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am
It looks like they can't easily reach a common position, but we'll see. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
Co. v Thirsty Moose, Inc., 19 AD3d 721, 722 [3d Dept 2005]; see Saint James’ Episcopal Church v F.O.C.U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
