Search for: "State of Ohio" Results 6801 - 6820 of 36,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2017, 10:44 am by Ari Glogower
This week, Ari Glogower (Ohio State) reviews a new article by Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The Federalist Safeguards of Progressive Taxation, 93 N.Y.U. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 3:37 am by Immigration Prof
In this piece in The Hill, Dayton, Ohio police chief Richard Biehl explains some policing basics about state and local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities: "Relying on state and local law enforcement to carry out federal immigration enforcement... [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:00 pm by Paul Caron
Joshua Blank (UC-Irvine) presents Progressive Tax Procedure (with Ari Glogower (Ohio State)) today at San Diego as part of its Tax Law Speaker Series: Discussions of progressive taxation in the United States—and of whether the rich pay enough in taxes—generally focus on the structure of the substantive tax law, such... [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:14 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States Gets Wrong About Prosecutorial Discretion (Ohio State Law Journal Online, Volume 85 (forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:16 pm by Shawn R. Dominy, Attorney at Law
The post on May 3, 2010 explained that defendants in Ohio O.V.I. cases do not have the ability to challenge the general reliability of breath testing machines at trial due to the holding in State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm by Joe Koncelik
 Inspectors can be wrong in stating a violation has occurred. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:02 pm by News Desk
Indiana has joined Ohio, North Dakota and Wisconsin in a voluntary meat and poultry shipment program run by the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:48 am by MBettman
Ohio, like many states, is finding the supply of “reliable” execution drugs drying up, since many drug companies now refuse to allow their drugs to be used for this purpose. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 1:03 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled 6-0 today that, when a trial court permits an alternate juror to be present during deliberations by seated jury members over the objection of the defendant, the jury returns a verdict adverse to the defendant, and the defendant moves for a new trial based on the presence of the alternate juror, the state bears the burden of proving that the presence of the alternate juror during deliberations did not result in prejudice to the defendant. [read post]