Search for: "State v Smith" Results 6801 - 6820 of 11,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm by David Kopel
They believed that there was an unmet need for a store which provide personalized service; this includes gun smithing, hunter safety training and the firearms safety training which is a prerequisite for gun purchases in the state. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff failed to return to Manhattan by the stated deadline under the settlement. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am by John Floyd
  In 2020, the appeals court reaffirmed this double standard in Lopez v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:25 am by Steve McConnell
They now have to puzzle through how to argue for appealability in one but not the other.)More recently we saw some expert admissibility rulings in a Neurontin suicide case, Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm by Jim Walker
  He wrote the amicus curiae briefs for  the cruise industry in the case of Carnival v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:22 am
There was no other evidence at all connecting Smith to the crime. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:21 am by Ryan McLane
  The open and obvious doctrine is by no means a new principle of law, however, the Kentucky Court of Appeals just affirmed its broad application in the case Smith v. [read post]