Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 22,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2025, 2:25 pm
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:19 am
We're making an exception for today's decision in Gazal v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Doe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada this morning released its reasons for judgment in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:30 am
One Beacon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
Also, the plaintiff bears the burden to prove that the defendant had sufficient contacts to warrant exercise of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:33 pm
Pharmaceutical Resources and Par Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm
" That is what the United States Attorneys Office, Southern District of New York, contends in its objection filed yesterday in the case of United States Of America v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 7:01 am
Bad Case Alert ***People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Myrick v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 11:53 am
Thus, the Court concluded that there was a prima facie showing of a Sixth Amendment violation, and that the burden then shifted to the State to show a significant state interest in the aspects of the jury selection system that caused the underrepresentation. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
Defendants met their burden by establishing as a matter of law that they, inter alia, were not negligent and that plaintiff sustained no damages, two essential elements of a legal malpractice cause of action (see Oot v Arno, 275 AD2d 1023, 713 N.Y.S.2d 382), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Ginther v Heim [appeal No. 1], AD3d , 2008 NY Slip Op 7430, 2008 N.Y. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
By repeatedly mentioning that United provided 'no evidence,' we are skeptical that Macy’s understands that it bears the burden of providing 'some evidence' of invalidity. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:19 am
Case Name: Ringolsby, Jr. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:00 am
In Ocean Concrete, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 4:02 pm
Granholm v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:50 pm
Elcommerce states that it does not have minimum contacts [...] with the state of Pennsylvania. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Further, the Court said the channeling of the money imposed no tax burden on the taxpayers who sued to challenge the program. [read post]
