Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 6801 - 6820 of 29,295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Lawmakers in Congress, California, and other states blamed “the industry structure that tied-house arrangements created . . . . for producing monopolies and exclusive dealing arrangements, for causing a vast growth in the number of saloons and bars, for fostering commercial bribery, and for generating other ‘serious social and political evils,’ including political corruption, irresponsible ownership of retail outlets, and intemperance. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 2:19 pm
Hatch argues, among other points, that a decision of the United States Supreme Court, Reno v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
" United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
Imposing such costs on states, counties and localities is precisely the kind of inequitable risk allocation that Congress passed the ACA to remedy. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:05 am
Supreme Court, Marbury v Madison, 1 Cranch 137, [1803]. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm by Annemarie Bridy
The court acknowledged conflicting decisions on the point but quoted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
"Clear enough.But then the Supreme Court held in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]