Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 6801 - 6820
of 11,374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
State of California (1978) 21 Cal.3d 313 (Addison) recognized “a general policy which favors relieving plaintiff from the bar of a limitations statute when, possessing several legal remedies he, reasonably and in good faith, pursues one designed to lessen the extent of his injuries or damage. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
United States, 20-7622, involving whether the Court of Indian Offenses of the Ute Mountain Ute Agency is a federal agency for purposes of a criminal conviction in that court. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 11:28 am
This differs from states that follow a “contributory negligence” system, which we’re lucky this doesn’t apply for California because being even slightly at fault can bar you from recovering any damages. 2. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:25 am
" A California state appeals court barred the suit from going forward, ruling it was preempted by federal law. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:35 am
In addition, most states and provinces set a statute of limitations of 2 to 3 years on personal injury cases resulting from car accidents–after that, attempts to sue are nearly guaranteed to get thrown out of court barring very exceptional circumstances (such as comas from trauma). 2. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
California – California Boards Want to Keep Pandemic Rules for Public Meetings. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:56 pm
Pietz points out that (1) John Steele has sent letters like this one into California demanding settlement for copyright claims; (2) Paul Hansmeier appeared in San Francisco as the designated representative of AF Holdings, and (3) Duffy is a member of the California State Bar and was counsel of record in AF Holdings cases in San Francisco. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
Plaintiff appealed, but both a trial court and the state supreme court ultimately affirmed. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
Plaintiff appealed, but both a trial court and the state supreme court ultimately affirmed. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:56 am
The contention here is that for all applied purposes, this is essentially a total ban, and as such, defies the California Constitution and the state's passage of the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:44 pm
NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW, 1999 – JURIST DOCTORATE, FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY, 1996 – BACHELOR OF ARTS, POLITICAL SCIENCE, UNITED STATES NAVY, 1985-1993 – HONOURABLE DISCHARGE ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY, 1999-2002 – MIAMI DADE STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE ADJUNCT PROFESSOR – LEGAL STUDIES PROGRAM, 2003-2005 – JONES COLLEGE ADMITTED: FLORIDA BAR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF… [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:33 pm
Several months later, the California Bar seized Gabueva's practice on the grounds that she "led clients to believe that she was an attorney and qualified to practice immigration law," even though she had "never been admitted to the State Bar of California"; and a federal criminal complaint was filed against her on similar grounds, though that case was later dismissed. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of California, January 21, 2010 People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:48 pm
The court allowed that unclean hands can bar a laches defense in Lanham Act cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
Minton, 19-1135Issues: (1) Whether the free exercise clause of the First Amendment bars a state-law claim that seeks to compel a religiously affiliated hospital to allow medical procedures that violate its longstanding, deeply held religious beliefs; and (2) whether the First Amendment’s free expression and free association guarantees bar a state-law claim that seeks to compel a religiously affiliated hospital to allow — and thereby endorse and be… [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
California v. [read post]
