Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 6801 - 6820 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2016, 4:23 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:54 am by Neil Burns
  Apparently the United States Marshalls had to forcibly enter his house to bring him to the hearing. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:09 pm by Dean T. Kirby, Jr.
And the bankruptcy court can override the law of setoff by concluding on public policy grounds that the debt for attorney fees has greater dignity than a judgment for damages rendered by a United States District Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:22 pm by Ken White
This week's case in point: the United Kingdom. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Just Security, Marty Lederman disputes the government’s contention in its reply brief that the connection between a foreign national and a United States person or entity “must be ‘substantial,’” calling “[t]hat adjective … a limitation of the SG’s own creation, one not found in the Court’s opinion. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:24 pm by JP Sarmiento
With the approved Immigrant Visa, our client can come to the United States immediately, and he will get his green card within two months of entry. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:32 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 11:15 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:33 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 12:58 am by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
13 May 2015, 11:40 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:14 am by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 am by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am by Allison Trzop
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:48 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In Pineda-Moreno vs United States, petitioner, an Oregonian, maintained a huge pot farm hidden deep within the forests of Southern Oregon and Northern California. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
11 May 2015, 1:52 am by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:40 pm by David Oxenford
 This is also in line with prior FCC cases where it does not get involved in the adjudication of state law issues. [read post]