Search for: "United States of America v " Results 6801 - 6820 of 8,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
McVerry of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania ordering it to pay $367,369 in e-discovery costs to Hoosier Racing Tire Corp. and Dirt Motor Sports, Inc., the winning defendants in Race Tires America Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to… [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:39 am by PaulKostro
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.; Bank of America Corporation; United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit; No. 09–4676; May 18, 2011 : “[A] defendant can contractually waive his right to remove an action brought in a state court. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
” (8)  Recently, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio found that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
To the Senate of the United States: With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Extradition Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Malaysia, and a related exchange of notes signed at Kuala Lumpur on August 3, 1995. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:15 am by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued the Initial Determination (“ID”) finding that Samsung had not violated Section 337 in connection with the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multi-layer ceramic capacitors by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
To the Senate of the United States: With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Extradition Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, signed at Washington on October 1, 1996. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm by Brian Cuban
It is also the opinion of The Supreme Court Of The United States(SCOTUS). [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In the second post, the present position will be compared with the current state of the law in Germany, with some references to the law in the United States of America. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:27 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: OP 10-0280, 2011 MT 104, UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, Petitioner v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:46 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Benjamin v Ahren Bennett and United States of America Bond v Progressive Ins Co Capobianco v Simolike Heim v Medical Care Knopick v Connelly People v. [read post]