Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 191,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
The Government must evaluate reasonableness based on the particular contractor’s operations, rather than a “universal, objective determination of what the cost would have been to other contractors at large. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:29 am
Tortilla Factory, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:21 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a landmark whistleblower case Murray v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
In this respect, courts may eventually consider adopting a nuanced approach and applying all or part of the following test: When (i) in light of the applicable methods and canons of construction, a statute allows a margin of interpretation, (ii) the administrative interpretation of the statute remains within this margin, and (iii) the applicable international, constitutional, statutory, or other constraints permit or, at least, do not exclude judicial deference either generally or in… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 6:54 am
Pinto v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Employee wants former employees to be ordered to attend discovery In Khatib v Goeasy Ltd., the matter related to a wrongful dismissal action for which a trial date has been set. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Because her pleading contained only “bare legal conclusions” as to the purported “centralized control of labor relations,” the AD2 left the dismissal undisturbed.Don’t think anyone broadcasted that.# # #L. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Employee wants former employees to be ordered to attend discovery In Khatib v Goeasy Ltd., the matter related to a wrongful dismissal action for which a trial date has been set. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
That's Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:31 am
As a result, the workers had been underpaid during their annual leave. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
No replacement costs could be paid before the money had been spent by the insured. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:47 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Gilead Sciences Inc and another NuCana PLC [2023] EWHC 611 (Pat) (21 March 2023)This was an action by Gilead Sciences Inc. and its British subsidiary Gilead Sciences Ltd ("Gilead") for revocation of two European Patents (UK) that had been granted to NuCana Plc ("NoCana"), namely EP 2955 190 B1 (“EP190”) and EP 3 904 365 B1 (“EP365”). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The priority right was found to be invalid because only the priority right of one of the three inventors had been assigned to the patent proprietor. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
” See Buckley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —As we recently blogged, FDA released three draft guidance documents to help enhance the predictability, consistency, and transparency of the 510(k) program. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. and Carnival Cruise Lines v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 2:49 pm
Biden should have been expected. [read post]
