Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The case is Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
[v] Iowa law also prohibits local governments, such as cities and counties, from setting minimum wages higher than the state rate. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:59 am
Supreme Court should now clarify its doctrine that all laws infringing on First Amendment freedoms be narrowly tailored [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and James Knight on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Institute for Free Speech v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
Research and Resources Privacy in Social Media, Andrei Marmor, Cornell University – Law School The Ironic Privacy Act, Margaret Hu, Washington and Lee University – School of Law Privacy Losses as Wrongful Gains, Bernard Chao, University of Denver Sturm College of Law Protection for ‘Inferences Drawn:’ A Comparison between the General Data Protection Rule and the California Consumer Privacy Act, Jody Blanke, Mercer University… [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
Yelp The California Supreme Court Didn’t Ruin Section 230 (Today)–Hassell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
While some groups had early success, United States District Court Judge Dolly Gee denied a request by Uber and Postmates to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of AB 5 against them while their constitutional challenge to the law plays out, in Olson, et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Avery v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
On the civil side: First up are California v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 5:56 pm
Additional Resources: Rizo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:06 am
Some states, like California (Cal. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 2:49 am
" See Over the Rainbow, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:59 pm
The Second Circuit ruling in New York v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:34 pm
Hardware Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:59 pm
As well as what Witkin says is the law of California with respect to appellate review. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
The new law also provides additional changes regarding reasonable covenant durations, disclosure requirements, enforcement limitations, remedies, and venue and choice of law restrictions. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 10:07 am
” While this area of the law has not been fully clarified by the courts, the above precedent from the Barnes v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
A second is California v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:17 pm
(Textron) and respondent Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (Travelers) raises the issue whether an earlier choice of law ruling in a Rhode Island coverage action between the parties qualifies for collateral and judicial estoppel effect, thus precluding Textron from seeking coverage under California law in the current California coverage action, and leading to the conclusion that Textron’s claim is outside the policy period. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 10:20 am
App. 5th 1026 (2017), the California Court of Appeals held that, under California law, opioid related claims alleging intentional and negligent misrepresentations did not constitute an “accident” and therefore were not an “occurrence” under the policy. [read post]
