Search for: "Church v. Church"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 7,901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:26 pm
The case, O’Brien Industrial Holdings v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:29 pm
The dispute in Turnage v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:57 am
Massachusetts White Collar Crime Prof Blog Sotomayor and White Collar Crime Opinions The Numbers Confirm that Sotomayor is “Tough on White Collar Crime” Disability Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law Preliminary Review of Disability Cases of Judge Sonia Sotomayor Elections Election Law Blog Viewing Judge Sotomayor Through Her Election Law Decisions: Careful, Thoughtful, Mainstream Leaning Left Environmental Climate Intel Souter, Sotomayor and the Future of… [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:29 pm
The facts of Fort Bend County v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:02 pm
In a famous case, Leonard v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm
“Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Because he claimed that his religious beliefs had been infringed, on account of him being a member of the International Church of Jediism – i.e he believed he was a Jedi Knight. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
to convince the world that the Christian church was a plagiarism. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
It’s no better for non-profits, just think about the claims for churches and synagogues, or when claims of fraud occur in major charities. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:40 pm
The Mississippi case, which involved the fatal beating of a 56-year-old woman who had just been at church choir practice, was the third such stay since the justices decided in September to consider the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:08 pm
Daniel and Francine Scinto Foundation v City of Orange, 2016 WL 4150453 (CDCA 8/3/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Equal Protection, RLUIPA, Takings [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
For example, Congress desperately needs to amend the law making it possible for victims to sue the viewers and producers of their porn images after the Supreme Court read the law narrowly in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:53 am
Whatever one thinks of Mitchell's reasoning, it's curious to learn that ADF again purports to find authority in Dean v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:16 am
FOOTNOTES [1] “Qualified Institutional Investors” include (i) a broker or dealer registered under Section 15 of the Exchange Act; (ii) a bank as defined in Section 3(a)(6) of the Exchange Act; (iii) an insurance company as defined in Section 3(a)(19) of the Exchange Act; (iv) an investment company registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940; (v) a person registered as an investment adviser under section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; (vi) a… [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 5:30 am
Trunk v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:22 am
Tanner Kroeger and I are working on a paper on Harvard College v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:25 pm
In Ramos v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:28 am
Massey v. [read post]
