Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 6821 - 6840 of 21,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 5:50 am by James Hastings
I am a New Zealand barrister and solicitor, and registered Patent Attorney. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, defendants met their initial burden on the motion with respect to that element (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm by Ilya Somin
Unfortunately, Attorney General Jeff Sessions last year reinstituted a federal policy that helps state and local law enforcement agencies circumvent state limitations on forfeiture and keep a hefty share of the profits for themselves. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am by Theresa Lee and Emily Zhang
Lee and Emily Rong Zhang are attorneys with the Voting Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, which filed amicus briefs supporting the challengers in Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:39 am by Phil Dixon
Some errors, however, are deemed so serious and capable of affecting the fundamental integrity of the trial that harmless error review does not apply. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Washington Post, Ann Marimow reports that “The low-profile case attracted outsized attention because of [Deputy Attorney General Rod] Rosenstein’s appearance at the court. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm by MOTP
In his answer, Weinberg generally denied the accusations against him, and, among other defenses, he asserted the affirmative defense of duress. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
For some differing views from other courts and a state attorney general about guns and public housing, see this post. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm by Mark Walsh
Chavez-Meza was the case in which the government’s side was argued in April by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Resh, in which the court held that the rule suspending the statute of limitations for individual claims filed after a failed class action does not apply to subsequent class actions, “far from surprising given the Court’s general skepticism towards aggregate litigation. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
It was not mentioned in the submission by the solicitor general two weeks later in the In re Agnew case. [read post]