Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 152,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 am
Click here for earlier LB coverage on the case, Doe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
ACLU v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 7:04 am
In Vasquez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:55 am
After Trump v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:19 pm
In such a case, the arrested individual does not bear the burden of proving an unreasonable delay. [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:38 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 5:20 pm
Another intellectual-property dispute between two makers of iPhone flatulence-simulation apps does not seem at all unlikely (as of last year, there were maybe 75 such apps), and if one does, this will provide somebody with a template.Link: Infomedia, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:01 am
In Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:55 am
Leiman V. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
Interpreting the Supreme Court of the United States’s ruling in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:41 am
In Bronx Household of Faith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
In Anderson Living Trust v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
Today my co-counsel and I filed a petition for certiorari in the case of McCane v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 3:55 am
" Of course, she only mentions Morse v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
The post Plaintiffs Fire Back Against Florida’s Censorship Law–NetChoice v. [read post]
Agency's enforcing its rule prohibiting misconduct does not require that it show "employee's intent"
14 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Agency's enforcing its rule prohibiting misconduct does not require that it show "employee's intent"Matter of Daveiga v City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 10222, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Housing Authority dismissed Kymel Daveiga from his position as Supervisor of Grounds after he was found to have violated the Authority's policy prohibiting employees from "commit[ting] any . . . violation of the law either on or off duty or… [read post]
