Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2009, 11:15 pm
The case is titled Fun With Phonics, LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's briefAmalfitano v Rosenberg, 2009 NY Slip Op 01069, Decided on February 12, 2009, Court of AppealsPrecedents and legislative history are frequently referred to in briefs and court decisions. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Drawing on United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
LaPorte, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Late last month, in Gottlieb v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
- For EC Member States, according to Allianz v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
For some, that is enough to condemn it as an unwarranted interference in the affairs of a foreign sovereign State. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
The issue was whether this is a temporary taking, or simply "normal" planning delay and therefore not compensable.Recall that in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
LaPorte, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:22 am
In September 2008 we reported on the advisory opinion of the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Allianz SpA v West Tankers regarding the English courts' ability to issue anti-suit injunctions in support of arbitration agreements. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
" Albertas also states that similar publications in Austria were supported by the Austrian Ministry of Education and without the Bavarian state complaining. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:58 am
This, if I may state the obvious, will help you determine how to re-align your firm for the duration. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
The last point modifies the FMLA regulations to conform with a 2002 Supreme Court decision, Ragsdale v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:17 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
In Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
English Translation of the Korean KIKO (currency option) injunction. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:29 pm
An English version of the current Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model is available on the website of the Japan Patent Office (JPO). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
