Search for: "House v. State" Results 6821 - 6840 of 25,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2009, 11:57 am
As of May 1, the White House had not yet announced the president's choice. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
AU Optronics: is state attorney general’s parens patriae antitrust suit removable to federal court under CAFA? [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Although the Supreme Court ruled DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
., married-student housing at a religious college) would better be viewed not as implicating compelled speech, but instead, as David Cole suggested at argument, as raising the question whether the Court would, or might, craft additional exceptions to the general free exercise doctrine of Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 10:41 am by Giles Peaker
It isn’t so much of interest for the decision itself (though that is interesting) but about what the conduct of the freeholder, the tangle of the law and the messy outcome say about the state of leasehold law in general. [read post]
Currently the Bill is simply a framework to produce more detailed regulations (by statutory instrument), apparently placing important areas on the Secretary of State to decide rather than Parliament: the Bill provides that some aspects provided for in such regulations would require approval by both Houses of Parliament, while others could simply be brought in but could subsequently be annulled by either House by resolution. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am by Liskow & Lewis
On June 9, 2021, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1284 (“HB 1284”), which was introduced along with its Senate companion, SB 450, during the state’s 87th legislative session. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:05 pm by Emma Quinn-Judge
  The bill now pending in the state House of Representatives seeks to break the link between prior salary and future employment by preventing employers from asking for pay information until they have made formal offers of employment. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:05 pm by Emma Quinn-Judge
  The bill now pending in the state House of Representatives seeks to break the link between prior salary and future employment by preventing employers from asking for pay information until they have made formal offers of employment. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:27 am by richardholmesblog
When Superstrike took Rodrigues to court in June, the Court ruled that Superstrike was unable to recover possession under the Housing Act 1988 s.21 because it had failed to protect the tenant’s deposit. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Presumably what's good for the United States is good for everyone else too. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:38 am
Not a single Ninth Circuit crime there.So don't you dare drag down the good name of the International House of Pancakes into the Denny's muck. [read post]