Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 15,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2024, 8:39 pm
Unfortunately, many of those feelings continue in the weeks and months that follow. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:39 pm
Unfortunately, many of those feelings continue in the weeks and months that follow. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:16 am
It is not clear how much damage the reports about Hayes could do to Kitzhaber’s re-election campaign. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
See In re Glenn, 2016 WL, 55672 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:23 am
After some queries from its members last year, the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association struck a committee to evaluate ways to make it easier for in-house lawyers to explore their pro bono options, says Lawna Hurl, legal counsel with Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC in Calgary. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:23 am
After some queries from its members last year, the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association struck a committee to evaluate ways to make it easier for in-house lawyers to explore their pro bono options, says Lawna Hurl, legal counsel with Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC in Calgary. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:35 am
According to the memo, “In some situations, Quebec-domiciled companies chose to re-domicile outside of Quebec in an attempt to obtain, and afford, insurance. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
More important, I think, is that we want law to continue to be a destination career, one to which as many people as possible aspire. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
The Restatement continues to endorse a “new version” of the basic rule that contract terms are interpreted according to their “plain meaning” which would allow extrinsic evidence to be considered even when a contract is clear. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:17 am
The five verdicts read like short legal opinions, though they blissfully dispense with the footnotes and bluebooking. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:51 pm
Also under consideration is whether the FCC should continue to apply “the UHF discount” in assessing compliance with national ownership caps for TV, an issue which is discussed in more detail in the Television section, below. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Interestingly, she links to a 1997 memo that recommended FDA re-examine its 60-day aging process for hard cheeses made from raw milk. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Although a court would likely never rule on the question, an effort by a majority of senators to repeal the filibuster would be both legally valid and democratically acceptable.One reason that may hold back either party from eliminating the filibuster, however, is that today’s majority might be tomorrow’s minority, and the Democrats today should be mindful of that reality (as the Republicans were in 2003). [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
But even if that rule were correct, it wouldn’t really furnish an objection to Regents. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
Those are legally binding documents, "hard law". [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:28 pm
This year, they’re undefeated. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 1:34 am
If you’re not from DC yourself, you’re probably wondering how this can be. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
Res. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The Fourth Circuit agreed that the subsidies were available in all States, and ruled for the Government. [read post]
