Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 6821 - 6840
of 18,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2017, 3:35 am
On 4 May 2017 the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) delivered its judgment in the case Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde v Rīgas pašvaldības SIA ‘Rīgas satiksme’, answering two related questions: ‘(1) Must the phrase ‘is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the … third… [read post]
18 May 2017, 5:22 am
To see this game in action, we need only take a quick stroll down memory lane to Rainer v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:45 pm
Abbasi and Hernández v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:30 pm
The answer is an unqualified yes.In 1982, the Supreme Court decidedPlyler v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:48 am
Abbasi and Hernández v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:01 am
When the case first came before the Court, three justices (all southerners), including Chief Justice Fred Vinson, believed that the old “separate but equal” doctrine enunciated in Plessy v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
”), and in my experience in practice are addressed as “Judge” or “Justice. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:19 pm
In today’s case (Kingston v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am
” In Howell v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:22 am
You’re free to go. [read post]
14 May 2017, 12:23 pm
After legislative revisions in the states, it was re-instituted in 1976 by a 7-2 vote in Gregg v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
’ (In re Victor L. [read post]
11 May 2017, 9:48 am
Caira v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 9:48 am
Caira v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:37 am
Just pay separateshipping and handling.State v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod looks at County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
When you’re in Jones land and when you’re in Fitzgerald land turns out not be clear. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]