Search for: "Little v State" Results 6821 - 6840 of 26,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
“[V]irtually all the state police … [and] also the local police … can get [the exemption] and the feds can’t. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:54 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 5/5/10Cite: Peckham v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:13 am by Douglas Berman
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:11 am by Steven M. Gursten
I’ve written before about Justice Robert Young Jr., and while I will always respect the robe, I have little regard for his opinions as a jurist. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:36 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Following years of debate and state tax laws that pushed the limits on how to view physical presence, South Dakota v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:37 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  If the oral argument before the Supreme Court this morning is an accurate indication (and it may not be), they may have to wait a little longer. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:49 am
Law Review Article About Westbrook v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
Some quotes:The Indiana Court of Appeals listened to arguments Tuesday in the case of Burke v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
 Law watched Trapp exit the taxi carrying `a small little bag . . . almost like a shopping bag. [read post]