Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 22,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Could DOJ simply urge a court to adopt Justice Thomas's approach? [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
There is no other precisely defined judicial review standard and judges recurrently decide some matters de novo although an agency has presented a reasonable construction of the statute. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Because the land routes from elsewhere in Latin America all run through Guatemala and Mexico, as a practical matter, the new rule bars asylum to nearly all Latin American asylum seekers who do not apply in either of those countries (or another country they traversed).The rule is plainly illegal. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:27 am
Russell has worked on a broad range of broker-dealer regulatory matters and was responsible for, among other things, developing and drafting key components of the Commission’s recently adopted package of rulemakings and interpretations designed to enhance the quality and transparency of retail investors’ relationships with investment advisers and broker-dealers. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:38 am
Depublishing means that the Ninth Circuit’s Vasquez ruling is no longer binding on federal courts. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
Or consider the speedy adoption (once the Supreme Court disabled the Voting Rights Act’s requirement for Justice Department preclearance) of cumbersome voter ID laws, strict rules for purging inactive voter lists, or the reduction of voting hours and sites. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
In [Article 13 C, Section 2(d)], for example, the enactor adopted a requirement providing that, before a local government can impose, extend, or increase any special tax, voters must approve the tax by a two-thirds vote. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
" As a threshold matter, the notion that Section 5000A did not impose a mandate, but merely offered people a "choice" was manufactured at some point after the ACA was enacted. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
S. 144 (1991), the Court has adopted the presumption that “the power authoritatively to interpret its own regulations is a component of the agency’s delegated law-making powers. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
[redacted: harm to ongoing matter] while Trump and Gates were driving to LaGuardia Airport. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
What I’m describing today, therefore, is not the law factory as a private practice exception to the legal profession rule. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
That reasoning is incorrect as a matter of constitutional text and history, and it leads to poor results as a matter of policy for reasons explored at length in a forthcoming article and summarized here. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Even off Capitol Hill, it found a way to block perhaps the Trump administration’s most substantial anti-industry accomplishment in the past two years: a rule that would have required drug companies to list their [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
Adopted Euro (1999) Finland adopted the Euro on January 1, 1999, together with the other Euro countries. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
United States: “Let me ask you this question: If we conclude there is a hole in the statute that Congress has to amend, is it more likely that Congress will cure the statute if we rule for you or if we rule against you? [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:02 am
Nor, for that matter, do the proposals require “specific methods. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Of course, academic writings are by no means determinative in discerning what a legal rule is, let alone how it should be interpreted or applied. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:32 am
Firms that breach the rules could face a fine, the watchdog said. . . . [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:20 am
We adopt no uniform standard that will easily resolve all cases. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 6:29 am
The Board stated that, as an initial matter, the DPA’s power must derive from the Member State’s law implementing the ePrivacy Directive – that is, the DPA cannot automatically rely on its powers under the GDPR to enforce national ePrivacy rules. [read post]
