Search for: "RICHARD CHANG" Results 6821 - 6840 of 12,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 11:01 pm by Helena Bottemiller
Richard Raymond, the former Under Secretary for Food Safety, who led FSIS under the Bush administration, went public with his concerns about reducing the frequency of foreign audits this week. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:48 pm by Kevin Funnell
Acting Chairman Martin Gruenberg, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray and National Credit Union Administration Chairman Debbie Matz. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am by Jim Duffy
  Judge Thornton seems to rue a ‘major casualty’ of the change of government – the removal of the Chief Coroner’s appellate jurisdiction that one might have expected to help increase the quality of final decisions and ensure heightened consistency. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Of course, that balance could change as a result of the November 2012 elections. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members.” 15 U.S.C. § 78n-1(c)).  [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
 Richard Susskind argued that, “For many lawyers, it looks as if the party may soon be over. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:42 pm by Rick
It’s the sort of thing that I suspect would have shamed even Richard Nixon. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:42 pm by Rick
It’s the sort of thing that I suspect would have shamed even Richard Nixon. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:49 am by Ken
“They always hide behind academic freedom but their policies and actions can change if they so choose. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:39 pm by James Hamilton
The letter was also signed by Senators Carl Levin (D-MI), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Al Franken (D-MN) and Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 1:54 pm by David Kravets
“Since 9/11, our national life has changed forever. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm by My name
[3] Richard Gruner, To Let the Punishment Fit the Organization: Sanctioning Corporate Offenders Through Corporate Probation, 16 Am. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:28 am by SHG
Indeed, fear of such irrationality led Judge Richard A. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:28 am by Katharine Baker
Finnis would permit legislatures to make nonprocreative sex illegal and make birth control hard to come by, but he would not have the power to effect the change he wanted. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:07 pm by Lawrence Solum
Richard Delgado (Seattle University School of Law) has posted Recent Writing on Law and Happiness (Iowa Law Review, Vol. 97, p. 913, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]