Search for: "Smith v. SMITH"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 16,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
Security research continued, opponents Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan Smith Cy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Opponents:Christian Troncoso, BSA | The Software Alliance: we support good faith security testing. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:06 am
" Smith & Nephew Incorporated, et al v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Smith v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:59 am
The court relied on Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:55 pm
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has made it clear this week that, while the Senate is rapidly approaching recess, the Senate “will stay in [session] until a deal is struck to extend” the Patriot Act. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
Smith, (NC Super. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:27 am
Smith Goes to Washington is a famous example of a talking filibuster, where Smith’s character collapses after a 24-hour filibuster in the 1939 film. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
The defendant's intent to commit the murders may be inferred not only from his conduct, but by the surrounding circumstances (see People v Smith, 35 AD3d 635 [2006]). [54 A.D.3d 886] The defendant's contention that his statements were obtained in violation of his right to counsel is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, cannot be determined on this record. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:31 am
Harper”) and Deborah Harper, against appellees, Timothy Smith and Kathleen Smith (“Ms. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:02 am
In the case of Feld v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:59 pm
§ 146 pursuant to changes in the statute provided by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, in Biogen MA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:15 pm
[Lyle Denniston, SCOTUSBlog; Instapundit, citing “Supreme Court’s 1958 decision in NAACP v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:09 pm
A case such as Smith v Trafford Housing Trust is less clear cut. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:57 pm
Modglin v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:30 am
Call me, Ed Smith, anytime at 916-921-6400 if you were injured in or by a California train. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:58 am
The “conclusory assertions” they made had been rejected by other courts (Smith v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
