Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 6821 - 6840 of 37,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2020, 12:46 pm
This series of consultations will be a complement to the discussions held during the fifth session of the OEIGWG; the two annexes of the report of the fifth session containing respectively a compilation of written statements and a compilation of the concrete textual suggestions presented by States during the fifth session; the additional textual suggestions on the draft legally binding instrument received until the end of February 2020, in accordance with the … [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:27 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
C.10 speaks of using the prestige of judicial office to advance a person’s private interests [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegalNever Too Late 263 [Week ending May 3] The CJEU (again) on 3D trademarks: the Gömböc judgment | The non-systematic relevance of earlier IP rights: from Gömböc to Brompton Bicycle | Trade marks and mobile apps: the PlanetArt v Photobox saga draws to a close (in PlanetArt's favour) | SkyKicked: High Court confirms trade mark infringement | Is COVID-19 a Nietzschean moment for… [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:00 am by Erik Manukyan
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in Butters v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Shoshone Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation (Sovereign Immunity)Stephen C. v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 am by Léon Dijkman
For instance, in C-484/14 McFadden, the CJEU sought a remedy that would least infringe the defendant's rights, and in 26839/05 Kennedy v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:15 pm by Unknown
Shoshone Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation (Sovereign Immunity)Stephen C. v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:29 pm by Allan Blutstein
Hutchins v, EOUSA (D.D.C.) -- finding that EOUSA performed adequate search for grand jury records pertaining to plaintiff’s drug conspiracy conviction in 1996. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:10 pm
  From now on, I'll just plop my request for attorney's fees into the last paragraph of my opposition papers, claiming that the motion is frivolous, and say that's okay because I'm doing so pursuant to (a) and (c), not (f). [read post]