Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 6821 - 6840
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
Brockler, supra.The Supreme Court’s opinion goes on to explain that[b]efore he was indicted, Dunn denied any involvement in Adams's death and told Cleveland police that at the time of the murder, he was with his girlfriend, Sarah Mossor, and her friend Marquita Lewis. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
Mars C-470/93).However, importantly, the court added that to ensure the uniform protection of GI’s it is necessary to take account of the presumed expectation of the European, rather than the Finnish consumer. (2) When assessing whether to prohibit the use of the name Verlados used to market nationally a spirit drink distilled from apples in order to protect the geographical indication “Calvados”, what importance should be given to the following facts in the… [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:24 am
Rule 10b-5(b) does not prohibit a “mere failure to disclose material information,” as stated by the plaintiff. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
§ 3043(c). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
§ 3043(c). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
S. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:51 am
She says so in today's dissent in Lockhart v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
Ratonel et al v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:48 pm
This can be demonstrated by (a) establishing the Court’s resistance to recognizing the emergence of a substantive legitimate expectation in specific cases in which it is claimed (b) disclosing the broad set of grounds based on which the Court is willing to dislodge a legitimate expectation and (c) analysing the deferential standards of judicial review applied to these grounds.From amongst its earliest cases considering the doctrine, the Court has demonstrated… [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
B/c that affects whether consumers choose to interact w/it and the weight/credibility they give it. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
This question for advertisers is very significant, b/c of FTC’s interpretation of §5. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
All claims arising out of (a) a riot or insurrection, (b) a civil disturbance resulting in an official proclamation of a state of emergency, (c) a temporary curfew, or (d) martial law are agreed to constitute one ‘occurrence. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:50 am
Bd. of Health v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 8:30 pm
Because these Defendants' knowingly destroyed the data on their computers without their former employer's permission, their conduct fell within the State's computer crime laws. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Cir. says: it’s not primarily functional unless there are no other alternatives; this makes everything ornamental b/c there’s almost always an alternative. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
User-generated crafts raise unique issues b/c, while TM owners can turn a blind eye to personal use, they may need to take action to protect reputation. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:31 pm
§§ 1030(a)(2)(C), 1030(a)(4), 1030(a)(5)(B) and (C). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:46 am
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
